By Yoshiaki Hattori and Masami Tamura2024-03-06T15:00:00
Prior to the introduction of new guidance, before including Japanese participants into a multi-regional clinical trial (MRCT), the sponsor needed to conduct a standalone Japanese phase I study to ensure no significant difference in safety/pharmacokinetics (PK) between Japanese and non-Japanese participants. This requirement has been considered an obstacle for non-Japanese companies to conduct MRCTs including Japanese participants, which can lead to drug lag* and drug loss* in Japan. Based on this, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW)† took this situation seriously and reviewed the requirement for standalone Japanese Phase I trials.
Register now to continue to access industry news, editorials and podcasts plus one member-only journal article each month.
Log-in now using your MyTOPRA credentials, for unlimited access to all Regulatory Rapporteur journal articles, the online archive and latest industry news and podcasts.
LoginBecome a TOPRA member and join our global regulatory affairs community.
The peer-reviewed journal, published 11 times per year and available free to TOPRA members.
The Organisation for Professionals in Regulatory Affairs
TOPRA office
TOPRA Publishing, 6th Floor, 3 Harbour Exchange, South Quay, London E14 9GE, UK
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7510 2560
Email: publications@topra.org
TOPRA AISBL
Blvd du Souverain 280, 1160 Brussels, Belgium
Tel: +32 (0) 2 808 72 70
Site powered by Webvision Cloud